Evening. I hope everyone had a great week! I myself have had a very inspirational week, courtesy of Congressman Joe Scarborough and CNN columnist Ruben Navarrette Jr. Today I hope to try to respectfully rebut a column by Mr. Scarborough. I also plan on mocking Islamophobes who are paranoid that teaching children Arabic will lead to an Islamic caliphate.
Anyway. Enough with the drama. Let’s get to the one-man show!
If Facebook isn’t the problem, then what is?
In a column published Tuesday in Poltico, Congressman Joe Scarborough expressed his dismay over how the Internet has supposedly tainted our culture by promoting a form of “instant intimacy” that is devoid of those qualities inherent to building meaningful relationships.
Mr. Scarborough was especially perturbed by Facebook, which he believes “is cynically feeding the narcissistic appetites of a self-consumed culture that is populated by teenage vulgarians, desperate housewives and bored men.” He also said that Facebook is distracting students and professionals from their work.
Though Mr. Scarborough’s claim that Facebook disrupts productivity certainly reigns true—I waste at least two hours per day reading and responding to status updates; mind you, the majority of them are related to news—all his other allegations seem both superfluous and lacking in evidence.
According to Mr. Scarborough, social networking sites like Facebook are hampering our ability as humans to bond with one another on a genuinely intimate level. However, what is to say that online interactions are any less meaningful than face-to-face interactions. Perhaps I’m simply blinded by autism, which greatly inhibits my ability to relate with others on a face-to-face basis, but personally, I have found Facebook to be a wonderful tool for establishing and maintaining meaningful contact with others.
As a young child, I never spoke a word to my peers. Even during recess, I merely stood on the outskirts of the kickball field, lost in my own imagination. After being diagnosed with Asperger syndrome and subsequently medicated in 7th grade, I gradually started speaking to others, though only when absolutely necessary.
Fifteen years have passed since I was diagnosed, yet I still experience great trepidation when dealing with others in the real world. No matter how much I practice communicating by voice, I will likely always be inhibited to one degree or another by autism. This, however, doesn’t hold true for the Internet—a world in which I’m free to express myself without either fear or shame.
Granted, when I first began my online journey, I had no shame. I was a vulgar teenage ruffian bent on “talking mad stuff,” “smacking haters,” and displaying my purported intellectual dominance. But as I grew up, so did my online persona. I began using proper grammar and punctuation, I started thinking before I typed, and I gradually became a successful and productive ‘cyber citizen’ with a bevy of ‘cyber jobs’ and ‘cyber friends.’
I still have a few real-life associates with whom I share laughs or beers every now and again, but frankly, none of them have ever provided me with as much intellectual stimulation and down-to-Earth conversation as my Facebook friends. Perhaps this is due to my inability to attract worthwhile friends. Regardless, I would gladly give up my so-called ‘real friends’ any day over my online friends. They may not know my mannerisms and how badly I smell, but they certainly know me better than those in real life.
I realize, though, that I don’t represent the majority of Americans. There are many cases of perfectly socially capable men and women who’ve developed an obsessive relationship with the Internet, and in doing so jeopardized relationships with not only their friends, but also their family as well. By the same token, there are countless folks who are almost too social—to the point that they have more real-life friends than the average Facebook user. They wander about from bar to bar, befriending anyone who seems friendly enough. Aren’t their relationships as devoid of meaning as those online relationships Mr. Scarborough so fervently claims are destroying the very essence of human intimacy?
A wholeheartedly agree with Mr. Scarborough that “maybe we should all start paying closer attention to who we are becoming as a society.” An emotional disconnect has pervaded our society. This is evident by the tragic rise in juvenile criminals, mass shootings, and outright hatred like none I’ve ever witnessed before in my life. Nevertheless, I’m certain in my heart that simply hitting the ‘log out’ button will not solve any our problems as a society. These issues of detachment, obsession, and dare I say frolic (think ‘Jersey Show’) plaguing our society are endemic to much larger problems.
I understand that Facebook itself can be a problem, but so can anything else: money (gambling), food (obesity), sex (STDs), and even love (obsession). So instead of bemoaning the creation of a new form of communication, one that has greatly benefited many people like me, not to mention those individuals fighting for freedom in tyrannical regimes like Egypt, shouldn’t we instead try to determine what exactly is causing such disharmony among us—be it the erosion of values, the rise in vitriolic rhetoric, or even poor parenting?
You know, my life revolves around the Internet, but that doesn’t mean I don’t realize the value of real-life relationships. Nothing can ever replace that which links me to my parents, my brother, my cousins, my aunts, my uncles, and my grandmother. To me, Facebook is only a tool—a means to an end. I imagine that the majority of all Facebook users share this sentiment.
That said, why is there still such a disconnect among us? Why do some people put the Internet over their real friends and family? Why do some folks cherish their random bar friends more than they do those whom they’ve known all their lives? Why do some teenagers spend all day texting on the phone? Why am I unable to find meaningful friendship in the real world?
I don’t know the answer to any of the questions. All I know is that Facebook isn’t the problem. But the question remains: what is?
Beware: Children Who Learn Bunny Talk More Likely To Become Terrorists
Washington—In a public announcement Friday morning, renowned cultural scientist Sir Glenn Blehk warned parents and teachers about the dangers of Bunny Talk electives, claiming that children who learn Bunny Talk are 75% more likely to don bunny costumes, join Bunny terror cells, and eventually wage Bunny war against America’s precious gardens.
Sir Blehk’s announcement comes amid a brewing controversy concerning the rise in Bunny Talk electives being offered at public schools. As of February 2011, 95% of American high schools now offer Bunny Talk electives, the most common being Bunny Talk 101: What’s Up, Doc; Bunny Talk 102: Locating Pristine Gardens; Bunny Talk 103: Uprooting Tasty Carrots; and Bunny Talk 104: Waging Bunny Jihad.
“It’s all part of President Barak Hussein Obama, former President George W. Bush, and Bunny leader Bugs Bunny’s plan to implement a New World Bunny Garden,” Sir Blehk explained to reporters during the announcement, while using a chalkboard to draw the three aforementioned individuals and then connect them to one another with crooked lines. “Groups from the hardcore socialist and Communist left have joined forces with the Bunnies because they are a common enemy of gardeners and people who like carrot cake.”
Sir Blehk claims that the Bunnies’ hope is to topple the carrot cake industry, which, according to a statement released by Bugs Bunny in late 2010, “has left thousands of my brothers and sisters without enough carrots to eat.” A representative from the World Food Programme confirmed Bugs’ allegations, noting that in 2010 alone, over 250,000 Bunnies died from lack of nourishment.
“They think that by destroying the carrot cake industry, they can force the government into building them their own carrot garden,” said Beck, a scowl quickly forming on his face. “And since these cowards are too afraid to wage war by themselves, they’re essentially employing our children to do it for them.”
Ever since former President Bush took office in 2001, over 2,500 new child terrorist organizations have formed across the country. The majority of them are believed to be directly linked to the Bunny Jihad movement, though a small subset is tied to the equally dangerous Yogi Bear Jihad movement, which seeks to halt reruns of ‘The Yogi Bear Show’ on the basis that they’re insulting to bears.
One such child terrorist is twelve-year-old Elizabeth Hasselblehk (no relation to Sir Glenn Blehk), who, according to her mother, fled their home in Memphis mid November 2010.
“My husband and I thought that letting little Lizzy take Bunny Talk electives would give her a chance to expand her horizon and learn about another culture,” said Elizabeth’s mother, dabbing tears from her eyes. “But something . . . something happened, and Lizzy starting changing for the worst.”
She continued, “Then Halloween came around, and she begged us to buy her a bunny outfit. We obliged, thinking it would distract her from Bunny Talk. But it only pushed her further down the road of fanaticism.”
The FBI, which has been tracking Elizabeth, said that after she finished Bunny Talk 104 in mid November, she fled to Bugs Bunny’s hidden compound, where she was taught Advanced Bunny Talk. Soon after, she formed her own terror network and began tutoring other children who were interested in becoming Bunny Jihadists.
Elizabeth has since garnered a position on the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorists list alongside other notable Bunny Jihadists like Bugs Bunny, the Bionic Bunny, and Oswald ‘the Lucky’ Rabbit, who was convicted in 2008 of killing a gardener, but managed to ‘luckily’ flee before he could be sentenced.
“We tried to arrest Elizabeth two weeks ago, but she scampered off so fast that we lost her,” said FBI agent Leroy Stone.
“Then two days later we received a letter from her that said, 'Gee, ain’t I a stinker?'” he added, frustratedly banging his fist into his desk.
Sadly, Elizabeth is merely one of tens of thousands of young children who have become seduced by Bunny Talk and Bunny Jihad. According to Sir Glenn Blehk, if America doesn’t ban Bunny Talk electives and start persecuting Bunnies outright, there may soon come a time when such delicacies like carrot cake, baby carrots, and Carrot Top shows become just mere memories from the past.
“I just can’t bear to think of it anymore,” said Sir Blehk. “Take me now, Jesus!”
F.I.N.
---------------------------------------
#1. If you like sports, check out this hilarious satire piece courtesy of the Onion:
Kids In 'Scared-Straight' Program Visit Horrifying Cleveland Cavaliers Practice
#2. Thank you, Congressman Joe Scarborough, for inspiring the UNPAID column.
#3. Thank you, Ruben Navarrette Jr., for inspiring the UNPAID satire.
#4. God Bless the people of Egypt!
#5. Fuck Glenn Blehhhhhhhhhhhk!
Yeah, yeah, yeah, I’m a teenage vulgarian. I know ;-). Lol j/k.
pEaCe
-- No bulletin board 2nite. Very tired and just want to relax and get wasted.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment